‘Middle America’
High School:
Rivers nurture. Rivers inspire growth and prosperity. On broad sweeping banks, secured by annual crop feeding floods, civilizations were born. Disparate hunter-gatherers congregated in close proximity along expansive banks, morphing into sedentary villages; these were the first foundations of empires. Sumer can hardly be spoken of without also naming Tigris and Euphrates in the same sentence; proud Egypt-of-the-pyramids revered the Nile; India’s first inklings of promise bloomed upon the Indus and Ganges; and ancient China retains its prosperity in the ripples of the Yangtze and Yellow.
Not so, however, in Mesoamerica, where powerful civilizations emerged independently of complete dependence upon a single waterway. Instead, seasonal rains collected in above-ground reservoirs more commonly provided the necessary water supply. Drought, though, could yield cataclysmic results. This has led some anthropologists to assume that such natural disasters, combined with internal unrest generated by the lack of water, led to the natural demise of Mesoamerica’s greatest cultures. The classical Maya, for example, were highly sophisticated mathematicians and astronomers. Their cities cluttered the Yucatan of Mexico and the highlands and lowlands of Guatemala, but eventually succumbed to nature’s indifference, over two hundred years, at the end of the first millennia CE. “The Maya did not survive in 95 percent of the cities that depended on surface reservoirs for their water supply,” Richard B. Gill asserts, though his claims are not universally recognized. Nevertheless, drought and war is a killer combination.
To apply a comparison from European antiquity to Mesoamerica, the endless wars between the Greek city-states of the fifth and fourth centuries BCE led to a severe decline born of mutual exhaustion. Late Classical era Maya cities suffered similar problems; according to some, “the political landscape of the Classic Maya resembles many in the Old World...where a sophisticated and widely shared culture flourished amid perpetual division and conflict.” Mayan unity did not exist as cities partnered with one another against their neighbors, ushering in a cyclical pattern of rise and fall, which eventually led to a complete decline and eclipse of the once-prosperous Maya. Military conflict between neighbors was characteristic of Mesoamerica, just like anywhere else in the world. A dominant power emerged through war, built an empire, lorded it over the defeated, and collapsed when someone bigger and tougher came along.
Military operations depended upon the weather. Annual rains provided for crops, but, if the male population was gone from the fields during harvest time, food scarcity could make for a very poor winter. As such, Mesoamerican armies operated based upon their ability to feed themselves and how far and fast they could travel on foot. This made long-distance, prolonged campaigning unfeasible. These restraints limited military expansion outside one's immediate geographical homeland, and continued to plague Mesoamerican armies from the time of the Olmecs, in the two millennia before Christ, to the Spanish conquests of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries CE. Even so, beginning with the Olmecs, conquests - and the empires born of them - began to transform Mesoamerica from a land of disparate groups into a collection of culturally connected people. Common religious beliefs, language, and mannerisms spread outward from the power center, which at various times included the Olmecs, Toltecs, Maya, Tepanecs, and Aztec.
Intellectually, Mesoamerican civilizations made great strides, independent of the rest of the world. Ask yourself: what is the value of zero? Mathematician Tobias Dantzig called its discovery, “one of the greatest single achievements of the human race.” The Maya utilized it as a placeholder within their vigesimal (a numerical) system, and as a baseline for their calendars. This occurred almost simultaneously with Indian mathematicians’ use of it as a number, as early as the fourth century CE. Just who discovered zero is debated, and quite frankly, doesn’t really matter, because different cultures were using it for different reasons. Cut off from Europe, Asia, Africa and the silk roads where diplomatic and trade links extended (from Rome to Beijing, and Indonesia to western Africa), the advances of Mesoamerican peoples in mathematics, astronomy, medicine, crop cultivation, architecture, city planning and construction, engineering, and so many other aspects of human improvement is staggering to behold.
When the Spanish arrived, they saw the lack of the horse, draft animals, and wheeled transport as signs of backwardness. Indicative of human progress in the old world, the lack thereof in Mesoamerica was made apparent by the sheer difficulty of the terrain. Why walking was the primary mode of transport came sharply into focus as Cortes’s forces traversed Mexico’s eastern lowlands into the mountains, bordering the heart of the Aztec realm. When the great cities of Tenochtitlan and its neighbors came into view, the Spanish sense of superiority vanished in a haze of wonderment, echoed elsewhere by participants in later campaigns against the Maya cities and the Inca. In all their campaigns on the American mainland, Spanish armies relied heavily upon Mesoamerican warriors as allies; without them, Spain would not have forged an empire stretching from modern Texas to the borders of Chile.
Mesoamerican civilizations were highly sophisticated, enduring thousands of years of political, military, social, and artistic evolution, to produce an amazing display of distinctive, yet interconnected, nations, by the time of Columbus. Disease, war, and natural disasters ruined old realms, while paving way for the new. The arrival of the Europeans, however, proved disastrous for most; despite their common cultural values, they had no singular unity with which to drive off the invaders. Compounded by the influx of unknown diseases into the deepest parts of the continent, people who had never yet seen a Spaniard inadvertently perished by the diseases they brought with them. Civil Wars, rebellions, and internal grudges destroyed the rest.
Pyramids are an identifiable cultural link between Mesoamerican civilizations. Built across millennia by different people groups, they, nevertheless, share common design features, such as flat tops (boasting temples at the summit), and slopes, bisected by broad staircases, ascending skyward. Architectural characteristics aside, these masses of stone were temples to the divine, and integral pieces in Mesoamerican city-life, from the days of the Olmec, to the arrival of the Spanish. What can they tell us about the people - nay, the states - that built them, and do they provide evidence of common cultural links among pre-Columbian peoples? If so, what are they? For background, look here:
Simon Martin and Nikolai Grube, Chronicle of the Maya Kings and Queens: Deciphering the Dynasties of the Ancient Maya. (London: Thomas and Hudson, 2000), 21.
Hassig, Ross. War and Society in Ancient Mesoamerica. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992), 19 -23.
Dantzig, Tobias. Number, The Language of Science. (London: MacMillan, 1930), 13, 35; Mann. 1491, 22 -23; Native Mesoamerican Spirituality, ed. Miguel Leon-Portilla. (Mahwah: Paulist Press, 1980), 17.
Bernal Diaz del Castillo. The Conquest of New Spain, trans. J. M. Cohen. (New York: Penguin Books, 1962), 214 -215; Sancho, Pedro. An Account of the Conquest of Peru, trans.Philip Ainsworth Means. (New York: The Cortes Society, 1917), 153 -156.